Solution:1. Ordered archival imagery for the work areas from "Kanopus-V" and "Resurs-P" satellite images. Evaluated spectral separability of classes to identify mining objects. Results showed which objects can be successfully classified in the images and which may cause confusion, requiring more careful selection of standards and visual control by specialists during interpretation.
2. Updated and supplemented data from a previously created GIS.
3. In the NextGIS QGIS software, data was updated using new information. The resulting GIS map-scheme contained geoinformation layers that reflected preliminary information about all "mining objects," quarry areas, information on minerals, presence of dumps, etc.
4. Interpreted images and classified data.
5. Selected 40 images from 65 archival data, prioritized images without snow or clouds, summer-autumn period. Interpreted images visually, then classified and combined data into one layer.
6. Analyzed the obtained objects in conjunction with existing subsurface fund data and prepared for field studies. In addition to data integration, a special "confidence" scale was developed:
- 25% – quarry presence is unlikely;
- 50% – quarry presence is moderately likely;
- 75% – quarry presence is highly likely;
- 100% – the object is a quarry.
7. Data was evaluated accordingly and all other relevant attribute data was added (quarry condition, SWD presence, extraction area, type of mineral, satellite image used for interpretation, year of shooting).
8. Several road graphs were created and routes were planned for visiting objects of interest in preparation for field work.
9. The final stage of the project involved field surveys of objects of interest. As a result of the field work, 43 potential mining objects were surveyed, 21 of which were found to be quarries.